This is a serious subject, not a
joke, and this site is here to expose the actions of
those who exploited these young men and defrauded us
their fans. It is to defend the honor of everyone
involved who did not take part in it willingly. It
has become apparent to us in this extensive and
painstaking research that there were never just four
individual people known as "John", "Paul", "George",
and "Ringo" who comprised one Rock & Roll band
known as "The Beatles", and rose to fame as the
world's first supergroup. For all intents and
purposes as far as we can tell, no one such group
We are here to explore whether the original
individuals themselves ever existed (and if so, what
may have happened to them and by whom), but have not
been able thus far to calculate how many of each
persona were fraudulently presented to the world.
Please join us at the forum if you care to and can
be open-minded. This is a highly-emotional topic for
many of us, and most of us have very strong feelings
about it. We have started this work because we were
once fans to varying degrees, and many of us still
listen to and enjoy their music.
* * * * *
Were there Multiple Beatles?
Since the Beginning?
The purpose of this site is to present
evidence that the Beatles were always sets of
multiples since their inception, and were not
just four individual young men "from
Liverpool", as we've been led to believe. We
will be showing lots of pictures here as well
as on the forum so that we may provide our
I'm presenting here what
I see as the top 4 clues as regards the Beatles
being multiples. They're in no particular order,
although I do begin with the clue that I noticed
first when I began this research: Height
Differences - sometimes from year to year, and
sometimes within the same year.
you will view this with an open mind, and then
conduct your own research to see what you come up
with as to whether this seems likely or not.
sure to see our forum thread on "Why
The Use of Multiples?" if you don't
understand the possible reasons behind the
see how we've compared the different Pauls during the
same era by reading the 'sticky' topics here;
read about the different Johns here;
about the different Georges here;
and the different Ringos here.
you see anything strange here?
By the way, if anyone happens to come upon
an article written at VH1.com claiming to have
gotten the following picture from my site:
It is NOT from this site. That is a PID piece, and I do
not agree with what they are presenting.
You will also notice that nowhere on my site do I claim
to have "blown the lid off the biggest conspiracy of the
found that the Beatles fluctuate
within various height ratios over the
Clue #1: Heights
interesting to note that there were
different shapes, sizes and styles
of eyebrows over the years.
Clue #2: Eyebrows
ears also fluctuated wildly with
each Beatle, as to shape, size,
placement on the head, and which
type of earlobes they had (attached
or unattached). Fake ears have been
noted since as far back as 1964.
another issue that must be
addressed. There is a definite
difference in the teeth - back and
forth as to size and shaping (though
always holding the same pattern) -
from time to time.
Clue #4: Teeth