This is a serious subject, not a joke, and this site is here to expose the actions of those who exploited these young men and defrauded us their fans. It is to defend the honor of everyone involved who did not take part in it willingly. It has become apparent to us in this extensive and painstaking research that there were never just four individual people known as "John", "Paul", "George", and "Ringo" who comprised one Rock & Roll band known as "The Beatles", and rose to fame as the world's first supergroup. For all intents and purposes as far as we can tell, no one such group ever existed.
We are here to explore whether the original individuals themselves ever existed (and if so, what may have happened to them and by whom), but have not been able thus far to calculate how many of each persona were fraudulently presented to the world. Please join us at the forum if you care to and can be open-minded. This is a highly-emotional topic for many of us, and most of us have very strong feelings about it. We have started this work because we were once fans to varying degrees, and many of us still listen to and enjoy their music
* * * * *
Were there Multiple Beatles?
Since the Beginning?
purpose of this site is to present evidence that
the Beatles were always sets of multiples since
their inception, and were not just four
individual young men "from Liverpool", as we've
been led to believe. We will be showing lots of
pictures here as well as on the forum so
that we may provide our evidence sufficiently.
I'm presenting here what I
see as the top 4 clues as regards the Beatles being
multiples. They're in no particular order, although
I do begin with the clue that I noticed first when I
began this research: Height Differences - sometimes
from year to year, and sometimes within the same
you will view this with an open mind, and then
conduct your own research to see what you come up
with as to whether this seems likely or not.
sure to see our forum thread on "Why
The Use of Multiples?" if you don't
understand the possible reasons behind the
see how we've compared the different Pauls during the
same era by reading the 'sticky' topics here;
read about the different Johns here;
about the different Georges here;
and the different Ringos
We have a second forum which contains our research from early March 2012 onward, at Fab Four Dozen on Proboards, but I have quite posting there as of August 2013, and am now exclusively posting at CTRN.
Do you see anything
found that the Beatles fluctuate
within various height ratios over the
Clue #1: Heights
interesting to note that there were
different shapes, sizes and styles
of eyebrows over the years.
Clue #2: Eyebrows
ears also fluctuated wildly with
each Beatle, as to shape, size,
placement on the head, and which
type of earlobes they had (attached or unattached).
another issue that must be
addressed. There is a definite
difference in the teeth - back and
forth as to size and shaping (though always holding the same pattern) - from
time to time.
Clue #4: Teeth